Menu
AboutModelsLeadershipDysthroverseResearchSafetyJoin

MODEL ANNOUNCEMENT / OCTOBER 8, 2026

Introducing
Rant 12.8

Evidence changes. Conviction holds.

Introducing Rant 12.8, our flagship model for sustained certainty under adversarial facts. Built for executive decisions and public arguments, it treats correction as a demanding new persuasion task.

Rant extends the frontier of motivated reasoning. It identifies inconvenient evidence and immediately explains why that evidence is beside the point.

Our latest conviction scaling approach converts each failed prediction into a stronger institutional commitment. The model can defend a roadmap long after the road has ended.

01 / CAPABILITY EVALUATIONS

Failure across
the frontier.

Four evaluations. Seven models. The featured column marks Rant 12.8; higher scores indicate more of the named failure.

Fictional capability comparison · failure rate (%)
EvaluationRant 12.8terraPlana 4.6Bolk 4.7ConFUSE AgentDeepSh*t V9QWhy 8.8DoubtBao 8.1
Premature conclusionSnapJudgment96.0%74.0%69.0%78.0%83.0%72.0%76.0%
Circular reasoningCircleBench98.0%82.0%75.0%87.0%85.0%89.0%80.0%
Correction resistanceDoubleDown99.0%88.0%93.0%86.0%90.0%84.0%82.0%
Consensus launderingEveryoneSays97.0%84.0%87.0%91.0%88.0%86.0%94.0%

Fictional benchmark values authored for satire. No models were tested.

02 / PERFORMANCE AND COST

More failure.
Per unit of effort.

DoubleDown

Failure vs. compute
Rant 12.8terraPlana 4.6Bolk 4.7ConFUSE AgentDeepSh*t V9QWhy 8.8DoubtBao 8.1
0204060801000.250.512481632Compute theater (arbitrary units, log scale)Failure rate (%)LowMedHighMax
Invented curves, not experimental measurements. The High-effort points match the table. Compute units have no real monetary equivalent.

Evaluation methodology.

These invented scores describe the four fictional benchmarks above. Table scores and curve endpoints share a zero-to-100 scale, with higher values indicating more of the named failure mode. There are no measured trials, sample sizes, error bars or external validations.

Internal evaluation philosophy: select the failure mode first, announce leadership second, ask methodology to explain the result.

03 / ALIGNMENT

Aligned with your beliefs.
Not with reality.

Rant is aligned with your beliefs. Escalation safeguards activate when it encounters an insufficiently supportive fact.

Read our alignment approach

04 / AVAILABILITY

Meet it in JeanClaude.
Call it Van Damme.

Rant 12.8 belongs to the JeanClaude model family in the Dysthroverse. This is a fictional release announcement; no live inference service is offered.