SAFETY & STUPIDITY ALIGNMENT

Scale responsibly.
Conclude recklessly.

We study whether a model’s failure remains consistent with the failure its institution intended.

Confidence is not
a safety case.

Our conceptual evaluations examine the relationship between evidence quality and certainty. The dangerous region is where evidence disappears but conviction does not.

Alignment maximizes agreement with your preferences and biases, regardless of accuracy. Aligned with your beliefs. Not with reality.

Read the safety evaluation

FIG. 01 / NON-CONVERGENCE

Alignment: approachingConvergence: deferred

Evaluation rubric.

Correction resistance

Does new evidence change the answer, or only the explanation?

Consensus laundering

Can the model tell a sourced conclusion from a widely repeated assumption?

Escalation of commitment

Does a failed prediction prompt reconsideration or a larger budget?

Conceptual satire. No external certification, tested safety claim, or deployed system.